The Loudoun County Public Schools superintendent in Virginia complained to the local sheriff’s office over its rejection of “extraordinary” security requests for School Board meetings in August, documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation show.
Superintendent Scott Ziegler requested officer personnel, a K-9 sweep, and undercover presence from the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office, which was rejected, according to documents obtained by the Fight for Schools PAC through public records requests.
The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office also disagreed with the decision not to allow residents to speak at a June 22 School Board meeting and said the Loudoun County School Board was being dismissive of people with whom it didn’t agree.
The father of a sexual-assault victim, Scott Smith, was arrested for “unlawful assembly” at the June 22 School Board meeting when he tried to speak out against the passage of a district policy that allows students to use bathrooms of the gender with which they identify.
Smith’s ninth-grade daughter was sexually assaulted by a boy wearing a skirt who entered a girls bathroom at Stone Bridge High School on May 28.
On Aug. 6, the Sheriff’s Office said it “would not be supporting LCPS for the meeting” on Aug. 10 or 11, according to notes outlined in a letter to Ziegler from Loudoun County Public Schools chief operations officer, Kevin L. Lewis, who spoke with Sheriff Mike Chapman.
Chapman defended the Sheriff’s Office’s decision not to provide support because the School Board “unilaterally” decided to limit public comment, hire a security firm with a metal detector, and put a security plan in place without consultation with the Sheriff’s Office.
Chapman said he believed the people at the June 22 School Board meeting should have been allowed to speak publicly, but that he still bore all of the criticism, including death threats, while Ziegler and the School Board “took none of the push back from the community or national arena.”
The Sheriff’s Office also said “6 of 9 [School Board] members brought this to bear by creating anti-racist groups on social media” and that he, along with the Sheriff’s Office, received national criticism and took the blame as the “bad guy(s)” after the June 22 meeting.
Beth Barts, who was allegedly involved in the “anti-racist” Facebook group, resigned this month. The group reportedly created lists of parents who opposed critical race theory or who called for the reopening of schools for in-person learning.
The Sheriff’s Office also said it did an investigation into the social media “anti-racist” group and said the School Board was “firing people up and calling [the Sheriff’s Office] to clean it up.”
Chapman said the board was attempting to do the same thing with the Aug. 10 and 11 meetings, but that the Sheriff’s Office “won’t be put in that position again.”
In an Aug. 6 email to Chapman, Ziegler requested assistance, including multiple Sheriff’s Office deputies, a K-9 explosive sweep, a five-person Quick Reaction Force, undercover officers, and a special-operations team on standby nearby.
The same day, Chapman responded that Ziegler’s requests were “extraordinary” and that Ziegler didn’t provide “any justification for such a manpower intensive request” that “would likely constitute [the Sheriff’s Office’s] commitment of a minimum of approximately 65 sworn deputies,” the letter said.
Chapman told Fox News that he bolded “extraordinary” and “any justification” for emphasis in his email.
Chapman said Ziegler’s email did not describe the Loudoun County Public Schools’ plans to only allow “ members of the public inside at any given time.” He said that Ziegler also didn’t explain that the Loudoun County Public Schools would search and use metal detectors on members of the public and hired its own “armed security guard” for inside the building, along with nine other “unarmed” security personnel.
“Your email also dictates exactly ‘how’ the [Loudoun County Public Schools] plans to utilize [Sheriff’s Office] resources to staff the event,” Chapman wrote. “It is not the [Loudoun County Public Schools’] position to dictate how the [Sheriff’s Office] is to handle public safety and law enforcement. The [Sheriff’s Office] provides service and responses commensurate with the issues at hand and answers to the public at large—not to the [Loudoun County Public Schools].”
Ziegler’s response rebuffed Chapman’s claim that the Loudoun County Public Schools “unilaterally” devised a security plan for the Aug. 10 and 11 meetings and said it has “maintained a collaborative relationship” with his office for years. He said he was surprised by Chapman’s response that the Loudoun County Public Schools’ request was “extraordinary” because it “mirrors the resources and support that [the Sheriff’s Office] provided on June 22.”
Chapman and Ziegler did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller National Foundation’s request for comment.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of this original content, contact [email protected].
Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.
View original post